"CouplingHasRigidConnection" line
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
"CouplingHasRigidConnection" line
What value would fellow train simmers recommend in the CouplingHasRigidConnection ( ? ) line of the coupling section of a WAG file?
ALEC - Supporter of MSTS and TSSH!
rufuskins- Posts : 3728
Join date : 2013-01-17
Age : 75
Location : Milnrow, Lancashire
Re: "CouplingHasRigidConnection" line
Alec, as far as I know, the only way to activate this is with a value of 1.
David
dforrest- Posts : 572
Join date : 2013-01-21
Age : 78
Location : St. Vincent and the Grenadines (and in an earlier life, Hull)
Re: "CouplingHasRigidConnection" line
What I have found is that in some wagons and coaches there is NO CouplingHasRigidConnection line, and in others a value of either 0 or 1.
My limited understanding as learned today is that the value of 1 is used when the coupling is stiff; i.e. BAR coupling between engine and tender - stated in Richter's manual. I've also seen reference to the line being written CouplingHasRigidConnection ()!
I have used CouplingHasRigidConnection (1) in my recent coaches, whilst using CouplingHasRigidConnection (0) in my recent wagons. Obviously if I can avoid it I wouldn't want to have to go back and carry out too many changes unless absolutely necessary!
My limited understanding as learned today is that the value of 1 is used when the coupling is stiff; i.e. BAR coupling between engine and tender - stated in Richter's manual. I've also seen reference to the line being written CouplingHasRigidConnection ()!
I have used CouplingHasRigidConnection (1) in my recent coaches, whilst using CouplingHasRigidConnection (0) in my recent wagons. Obviously if I can avoid it I wouldn't want to have to go back and carry out too many changes unless absolutely necessary!
ALEC - Supporter of MSTS and TSSH!
rufuskins- Posts : 3728
Join date : 2013-01-17
Age : 75
Location : Milnrow, Lancashire
Re: "CouplingHasRigidConnection" line
Hi Alec,
As far as I know what you have done is right as coaches normally have a rigid connection between them ( often labelled Automatic ), whereas older wagons with a chain coupling don't thus allowing some slack in the connection. Newer freight trains such as containers need a rigid connection as there isn't any play in the coupling.
Regards,
Stephen
As far as I know what you have done is right as coaches normally have a rigid connection between them ( often labelled Automatic ), whereas older wagons with a chain coupling don't thus allowing some slack in the connection. Newer freight trains such as containers need a rigid connection as there isn't any play in the coupling.
Regards,
Stephen
StephenRWells- Posts : 610
Join date : 2013-07-15
Age : 73
Location : Arncott,Oxfordshire
Re: "CouplingHasRigidConnection" line
I use the rigid line on fitted stock where the coupling would be screwed up tight to remove slack.
Doesn't seem to mater what the number in brackets is.
I leave the line out for unfitted.
Doesn't seem to mater what the number in brackets is.
I leave the line out for unfitted.
ianmacmillan- Posts : 180
Join date : 2013-01-18
Re: "CouplingHasRigidConnection" line
Thanks for the comment, and I will therefore amend the line in my L&Y wagons to suit either their fitted or unfitted status.
ALEC - Supporter of MSTS and TSSH!
rufuskins- Posts : 3728
Join date : 2013-01-17
Age : 75
Location : Milnrow, Lancashire
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|